Characteristics of Annual vs Perennial Systems
Jerry Glover
Presented February 20, 2003
Abstract. A fundamental challenge of the 21st Century will be to maintain both agricultural production and the integrity
of our natural ecosystems. Monocultures of annual crops, currently providing a majority of humanity's food and fiber needs,
provide sharp contrast to the diverse perennial plant communities characterizing, with few exceptions, natural ecosystems.
The large-scale conversion of natural ecosystems to annual cropping systems has profound effects from the field to the landscape
level. In comparison to perennial plants, annual crops inefficiently utilize water and nutrients resulting in degradation of soil
and water quality. North America's Corn Belt provides a vivid example of the impacts of large-scale conversion of native vegetation
to annual monocultures. The region, formerly tall-grass prairie under which the world's most fertile soils were formed, was largely
converted to annual cropping systems in less than 150 years. The result has been irrecoverable soil loss from the fields, widespread
contamination of surface waters in the region, and nutrient contamination of the Gulf of Mexico thousands of kilometers downstream.
Conversion of annually cropped land back to perennial cover provides great potential to mitigate these problems. As the global human
population grows to an expected 8 to 10 billion people over the next fifty years, it will not be sufficient to merely convert cropland
back to native vegetation. Innovative, productive cropping systems employing the efficiencies and conservative strategies of natural
ecosystems must be designed to meet the fundamental challenge of this century.
Presented by Jerry Glover, Ph.D., The Land Institute, Salina, KS, at the Sod Based Cropping System Conference, University of
Florida's Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Quincy, Florida, February 20-21, 2003.
www.landinstitute.org/vnews/display.v/ART/2003/02/20/3e78b3f2d0336